Re-Filing of the Petition After Withdrawal or Dismissal

Pennsylvania Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure

Rule: 336

Jurisdiction: PA

Bluebook Citation: Pa.R.J.C.P. 336

A. Re-filing . The attorney for the Commonwealth may re-file a petition after the petition has been withdrawn pursuant to Rule 335 or dismissed by the court. B. Motion for dismissal . The court may entertain a motion by the juvenile to dismiss the re-filed petition. Comment A juvenile may be rearrested after the allegations have been dismissed prior to jeopardy attaching if the statute of limitations has not expired. Cf. Commonwealth v. Revtai , 532 A.2d 1 (Pa. 1987). The petition should be dismissed upon a finding that the attorney for the Commonwealth acted to harass the juvenile, the offenses are beyond the statute of limitations, or there is some other prejudice to the juvenile. See Commonwealth v. Chermansky , 552 A.2d 1128 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1989). See also Commonwealth v. Thorpe , 701 A.2d 488 (Pa. 1997). If a petition is re-filed, the procedures of Rule 330 are to be followed. It may be necessary to have a detention hearing under the procedures of Rule 240(C). Official Note Rule 336 adopted April 1, 2005, effective October 1, 2005. B. Motion for dismissal . The court may entertain a motion by the juvenile to dismiss the re-filed petition. Comment A juvenile may be rearrested after the allegations have been dismissed prior to jeopardy attaching if the statute of limitations has not expired. Cf. Commonwealth v. Revtai , 532 A.2d 1 (Pa. 1987). The petition should be dismissed upon a finding that the attorney for the Commonwealth acted to harass the juvenile, the offenses are beyond the statute of limitations, or there is some other prejudice to the juvenile. See Commonwealth v. Chermansky , 552 A.2d 1128 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1989). See also Commonwealth v. Thorpe , 701 A.2d 488 (Pa. 1997). If a petition is re-filed, the procedures of Rule 330 are to be followed. It may be necessary to have a detention hearing under the procedures of Rule 240(C). Official Note Rule 336 adopted April 1, 2005, effective October 1, 2005. Comment A juvenile may be rearrested after the allegations have been dismissed prior to jeopardy attaching if the statute of limitations has not expired. Cf. Commonwealth v. Revtai , 532 A.2d 1 (Pa. 1987). The petition should be dismissed upon a finding that the attorney for the Commonwealth acted to harass the juvenile, the offenses are beyond the statute of limitations, or there is some other prejudice to the juvenile. See Commonwealth v. Chermansky , 552 A.2d 1128 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1989). See also Commonwealth v. Thorpe , 701 A.2d 488 (Pa. 1997). If a petition is re-filed, the procedures of Rule 330 are to be followed. It may be necessary to have a detention hearing under the procedures of Rule 240(C). Official Note Rule 336 adopted April 1, 2005, effective October 1, 2005. If a petition is re-filed, the procedures of Rule 330 are to be followed. It may be necessary to have a detention hearing under the procedures of Rule 240(C). Official Note Rule 336 adopted April 1, 2005, effective October 1, 2005. Official Note Rule 336 adopted April 1, 2005, effective October 1, 2005. Rule 336 adopted April 1, 2005, effective October 1, 2005.

Chat with this court rule using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this court rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.