(a) IN GENERAL. The court must decide any preliminary question about whether a witness is qualified, a privilege exists, or evi- dence is admissible. In so deciding, the court is not bound by evi- dence rules, except those on privilege. (b) RELEVANCE THAT DEPENDS ON A FACT. When the relevance of evidence depends on whether a fact exists, proof must be intro- duced sufficient to support a finding that the fact does exist. The court may admit the proposed evidence on the condition that the proof be introduced later. (c) CONDUCTING A HEARING SO THAT THE JURY CANNOT HEAR IT. The court must conduct any hearing on a preliminary question so that the jury cannot hear it if: (1) the hearing involves the admissibility of a confession; (2) a defendant in a criminal case is a witness and so re- quests; or (3) justice so requires. (d) CROSS-EXAMINING A DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL CASE. By testi- fying on a preliminary question, a defendant in a criminal case does not become subject to cross-examination on other issues in the case. (e) EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO WEIGHT AND CREDIBILITY. This rule does not limit a party’s right to introduce before the jury evi- dence that is relevant to the weight or credibility of other evi- dence. (As amended Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Oct. 1, 1987; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.)
Chat with this court rule using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this court rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.