Further, the recommendations of the Circuit Judges Time Standards

Committee and the District Judges Time Standards Committee to be implemented by the courts and appropriate agencies of the Unified Judicial System strongly endorse case-management plans. Such plans can establish tracks with scheduling and discovery provisions that are appropriate for various types of litigation. In fact, the Jefferson Circuit Court has operated under a casemanagement plan for over 20 years with notable efficiency, and that plan (which serves as an example of a proper case-management plan) may be found on the Website Court (http://10jc.alacourt.gov/DCMPRevision.html). To avoid any misunderstanding regarding the scope and intent of Rule 83, the committee notes that the language in the April 14, 1992, Amendment to Rule 83 or in the Committee Comments to that amendment the validity of an appropriate casemanagement plan. Jefferson to affect intended is not Circuit the of Any case-management plan is subject to the Supreme Court of Alabama’s general supervisory power to reject or to require amendment. Any circuit adopting a case-management plan shall ensure that it is published (including, but not limited to, being made available on the Web site of the circuit), so that the provisions of the case-management plan are readily available to the public. Note from the reporter of decisions: The order adopting the Committee Comments effective September 20, 2018, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from ___ So. 3d.