Decorum, Demeanor, and Communication with Jurors

Delaware Judges Code of Judicial Conduct*

Rule: 2.8

Jurisdiction: DE

Bluebook Citation: Del. Judges' C.J.C. 2.8

(A) A judge should require order and decorum in proceedings before the court. (B) A judge should be patient, dignified, respectful and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity, and should require similar conduct of the judge's staff, court officials, and others subject to the judge's direction and control, including lawyers to the extent consistent with their role in the adversary process. Comment: The duty to be respectful of others includes the responsibility to avoid comment or behavior that can reasonably be interpreted as manifesting prejudice or bias towards another on the basis of personal characteristics like race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status. In court proceedings, judges or former judges participating as litigants or counsel should not be called by their current or former titles or treated with greater familiarity or deference than other participants. 11 RULE 2.9 Ex Parte Communications. (A) A judge, except as authorized by law, should neither initiate nor consider ex parte or other communications concerning a pending or impending proceeding. Comment: The proscription against communications concerning a proceeding includes communications from lawyers, law teachers, and other persons who are not participants in the proceeding, except to the limited extent permitted. It does not preclude considering and ruling upon emergency applications where circumstances require. It does not preclude a judge from consulting with other judges, or with court personnel whose function is to aid the judge in carrying out adjudicative responsibilities. It is not intended to preclude communications between a judge and lawyers, or parties if unrepresented by counsel, concerning matters which are purely procedural, such as those which pertain to scheduling, and which in no way bear on the merits of the proceeding. However, such communications should, as soon as practicable, be fully disclosed by the judge to all lawyers, or parties if unrepresented by counsel, involved in the proceeding. A judge should make reasonable efforts to ensure that this provision is not violated through law clerks or other staff personnel. Except in the course of the judge's official duties, a judge should not initiate a communication of information to a sentencing judge or a probation or corrections officer but may provide to such persons information in response to a formal request. (B) A judge, however, may obtain the advice of a disinterested expert on the law applicable to a proceeding before the judge if the judge gives notice to the parties of the person consulted and the substance of the advice, and affords the parties reasonable opportunity to respond. Comment: An appropriate and often desirable procedure for a court to obtain the advice of a disinterested expert on legal issues is to invite the expert to file a brief amicus curiae. (C) A judge may, with consent of the parties, confer separately with the parties and their counsel in an effort to mediate or settle pending matters.

Chat with this court rule using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this court rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.