Cases initiative, after notice and a If the court of appeals determines that an appeal is frivolous, it may — on motion of any party or on its own reasonable opportunity for response — award each prevailing party just damages. In determining whether to award damages, the court must not consider any matter that does not appear in the record, briefs, or other papers filed in the court of appeals. Notes and Comments Comment to 1997 change: This is former Rule 84. The limit on the amount of the sanction that may be imposed is repealed. A requirement of notice and opportunity to respond is added. 65 If the trial court suggests a remittitur but the case is appealed before the remittitur is filed, the party who would make the remittitur may do so in the court of appeals in the same manner as in the trial court. The court of appeals must then render the judgment that the trial court should have rendered if the remittitur had been made in the trial court. 46.2. Appeal on Remittitur If a party makes the remittitur at the trial judge’s suggestion and the party benefitting from the remittitur appeals, the remitting party is not barred from contending in the court of appeals that all or part of the remittitur should not have been required, but the remitting party must perfect an appeal to raise that point. If the court of appeals sustains the remitting party's contention that remittitur should not have been required, the court must render the judgment that the trial court should have rendered. 46.3. Appeals Suggestion of Remittitur by Court of The court of appeals may suggest a remittitur. If the remittitur is timely filed, the court must reform and affirm the trial court's judgment in accordance with the remittitur. If the remittitur is not timely filed, the court must reverse the trial court's judgment. 46.4. Refusal to Remit Must Not Be Mentioned in Later Trial If the court of appeals suggests a remittitur but no remittitur the court's determination regarding remittitur is inadmissible in a later trial of the case. evidence of filed, is 46.5. Voluntary Remittitur If a court of appeals reverses the trial court's judgment because of a legal error that affects only part of the damages awarded by the judgment, the affected party may - within 15 days after the court of appeals' judgment - voluntarily remit the amount that the affected party believes will cure the reversible error. A party may include in a motion for rehearing - without waiving any complaint that the court of appeals erred - a conditional request that the court accept the remittitur and affirm the trial court's judgment as reduced. If the court of appeals is not determines the voluntary remittitur that sufficient to cure the reversible error, but that remittitur is appropriate, the court must suggest a remittitur in accordance with Rule 46.3. If the remittitur is timely filed and the court of appeals determines that the voluntary remittitur cures the reversible error, then the court must accept the remittitur and reform and affirm the trial court judgment in accordance with the remittitur. Notes and Comments party's petition for discretionary review or other request for relief. The Court of Criminal Appeals may, at any time, order that a “do not publish” notation be changed to “publish.” (c) Civil Cases. Opinions and memorandum opinions in civil cases issued on or after January 1, 2003 shall not be designated “do not publish.” Comment to 1997 change: This is former Rule 85. 47.3. Distribution of Opinions The rule is revised without substantive change. Comment to 2002 change: Subdivision 46.5 is amended to clarify the procedure for offering a voluntary remittitur. The offer may be made in a motion for rehearing without waiving any complaint that the court of appeals erred, thereby extending the deadlines for further appeal.
Chat with this court rule using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this court rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.