(d) Court’s Consideration of Nonprecedential or Unpublished
Federal Circuit Rules of Practice
Rule: 32.1
Jurisdiction: US
Bluebook Citation: Fed. Cir. R. 32.1
Dispositions. The court may refer to a nonprecedential or unpublished disposition in an opinion or order and may look to a nonprecedential or unpublished disposition for guidance or persuasive reasoning but will not give one of its own nonprecedential dispositions the effect of binding precedent. The court will not consider nonprecedential or unpublished dispositions of another court as binding precedent of that court unless the rules of that court so provide. (e) Request to Make an Opinion or Order Precedential. Within sixty (60) days after the court issues a nonprecedential opinion or order, any person may request through motion filed in the case that the opinion or order be reissued as precedential. The request will be considered by the panel that rendered the disposition. The motion must identify any case that person knows to be pending that would be determined or affected by reissuance as precedential. Parties to pending cases having a stake in the outcome of a decision on the motion must be given an opportunity to respond. If the request is granted, the opinion or order may be revised as appropriate. (f) Public Records. All dispositions by the court in any form will be in writing and are public records. Federal Circuit Rules of Practice (December 1, 2025) Page 151 (Return to Table of Contents) PRACTICE NOTES TO RULE 32.1 Filing an Opinion. An opinion is issued when ready. No particular day of the week is considered a “down day.” The judgment is entered on the day the opinion is filed with the clerk of court and transmitted to the parties. Availability of an Opinion. The court’s precedential and nonprecedential opinions are available in a variety of commercially available print and electronic media, as well as online through the court’s website and the U.S. Government Publishing Office’s website. Subscriptions. Subscriptions to daily opinions and other items are available through http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/email- the subscriptions. court’s website at Request to Make an Opinion or Order Precedential. It is improper to refer in a brief to a request to make an opinion or order precedential before the request has been acted on. Federal Circuit Rules of Practice (December 1, 2025) Page 152 (Return to Table of Contents) FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 33 Appeal Conferences The court may direct the attorneys — and, when appropriate, the parties — to participate in one or more conferences to address any matter that may aid in disposing of the proceedings, including simplifying the issues and discussing settlement. A judge or other person designated by the court may preside over the conference, which may be conducted in person or by telephone. Before a settlement conference, the attorneys must consult with their clients and obtain as much authority as feasible to settle the case. The court may, as a result of the conference, enter an order controlling the course of the proceedings or implementing any settlement agreement.
Chat with this court rule using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this court rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.