Clinton Building Supply, Inc., supra, 174 Conn. 517; the factual

admission is inadmissible as an offer to compromise. See Tomasso Bros., Inc. v. October Twenty-Four, Inc., supra, 198. If, considering the statement and surrounding circumstances, it is unclear whether the statement was intended to further a compromise or as a factual admission, the statement must be excluded. E.g., id., 199; Simone Corp. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co., supra, 490.