Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Decisions, 2006
56 published Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opinions from 2006 in the CiteLaw law library. All years · All courts
- Abbott Laboratories v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Acadia Technology, Inc. v. United States
- Adams v. United States
- Alza Corp. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.
- Amini Innovation Corp. v. Anthony California, Inc.
- Anaheim Gardens v. United States
- Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. United States Surgical Corp.
- Bicon, Inc. v. Straumann Co.
- Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc.
- Buchanan v. Nicholson
- Capizzano v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
- Coltec Industries, Inc. v. United States
- Computervision Corp. v. United States
- Cummins Inc. v. United States
- Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corp. v. Velan, Inc.
- Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. United States
- DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.
- Digital Control Inc. v. Charles Machine Works
- Doe v. United States
- DSU Medical Corp. v. JMS Co.
- DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG v. C.H. Patrick Co.
- Exigent Technology, Inc. v. Atrana Solutions, Inc.
- Ferring B.V. & Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
- Garcia v. Department of Homeland Security
- Gardiner, Kamya & Associates, P.C. v. Jackson
- Golden Blount, Inc. v. Robert H. Peterson Co.
- Goodrich v. United States
- Highway Equipment Co. v. FECO, Ltd.
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. ITT Industries, Inc.
- In re EchoStar Communications Corp.
- In re United States
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United States
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
- Kao Corp. v. Unilever United States, Inc.
- Liquid Dynamics Corp. v. Vaughan Co.
- Mayfield v. Nicholson
- Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.
- Metz v. United States
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States
- Old Stone Corp. v. United States
- On Demand Machine Corp. v. Ingram Industries, Inc.
- Ormco Corp. v. Align Technology, Inc.
- Pennington Seed, Inc. v. Produce Exchange No. 299
- Qualcomm Inc. v. Nokia Corp.
- Rex Service Corp. v. United States
- Roberto v. Department of the Navy
- Saab Cars USA, Inc. v. United States
- Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex, Inc.
- Smith v. Nicholson
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.
- TEG-Paradigm Environmental, Inc. v. United States
- United Pacific Insurance Co. v. United States
- United States v. Ford Motor Co.
- Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. v. Biogenex Laboratories, Inc.
- Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co.