York v. McGuire

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 63 N.Y.2d 760, 480 N.Y.S.2d 320, 469 N.E.2d 838, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4558

Decision Date: 9/20/1984

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: York v. McGuire, 63 N.Y.2d 760, 480 N.Y.S.2d 320, 469 N.E.2d 838, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4558 (1984)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1984

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 1% most-cited · cited by 141 decisions

141

Citing decisions

Authorities cited

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

N.Y. App. Div.120

N.Y. Sup. Ct.6

N.Y.5

S.D.N.Y.4

2d Cir.3

E.D.N.Y.2

Most recently cited by10

2026Roodenburg N.D.N.Y.
2026Rosenthal v. Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation 2d Cir.
2025Matter of Town of Greenburgh v. Civil Serv. Employees Assn., Inc., Local 1000 N.Y. App. Div.
2023Matter of Vargas v. Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y. N.Y. App. Div.
2021Matter of Ahmed v. O'Neill N.Y. App. Div.
2019Matter of Mathew v. Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y. N.Y. App. Div.
2018Matter of Santucci v. City of Mount Vernon N.Y. App. Div.
2017O'Brien v. Yugartis N.Y. App. Div.
2016Johnson v. County of Orange N.Y. App. Div.
2016Castro v. Schriro N.Y. App. Div.

Cites 4 cases

James v. Board of Education
Talamo v. Murphy
Stanziale v. Executive Department, Office of General Services
Bergamini v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

In the Matter of Cynthia York, Appellant, v Robert J. McGuire, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Attorneys

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Jeffrey S. Wasserman for appellant.
Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel {June A. Witterschein of counsel), for respondents.

majority

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that a probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and without a statement of reasons in the absence of any demonstration that dismissal was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of statutory or decisional law (Matter of Bergamini v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 62 NY2d 897; Matter of Stanziale v Executive Dept., 55 NY2d 735; Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 NY2d 637; James v Board of Educ., 37 NY2d 891).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.