Westwind Corp. v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Ga. Ct. App.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Most recently cited by10
- 2026Angelo Walker v. Glenwood Millpond Nrde LLC - the Glen at Lanier Crossing Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Norma Stinson v. Ga Woodridge 1, LLC D/B/A the Abernathy Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Turanaka Humbles v. Oxford Th Partners LLC Dba Oxford Townhomes Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Estate of Edward McNabb Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Jennifer McWilson v. Elul LLC Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Adria Blalock v. Kbc Ventures Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Rashod Robinson v. Acv Vx, LLC D/B/A Flats at East Atlanta Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Akisha Reid v. the Spoke at Peachtree Corners, LLC D/B/A Spoke at Peachtree Corners Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Charlene Lowe v. Sfr Jv-1 Property LLC Ga. Ct. App.
- 2026Reginald Hines v. Crystal Grove Townhomes Ga. Ct. App.
Cites 2 cases
- Chrysler Corp. v. Marinare
- Scott v. W. S. Badcock Corp.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
WESTWIND CORPORATION v. WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION (two cases).
Judges
- Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.
Attorneys
- Harrison Cronic, pro se.
- Campbell, Martin & Manley, David B. Manley III, for appellee.
Westwind Corporation filed two appeals in the Superior Court of Hall County from writs of possession granted by a magistrate court to Washington Federal Savings & Loan Association. Both appeals were dismissed under OCGA § 9-11-41 (b) for failure to prosecute. This opinion consolidates Westwind Corporation’s appeals from those dismissals.
1. Appellant enumerates five errors regarding the writs of possession issued by the magistrate court. The record affirmatively establishes that the superior court did not rule on any matters involving the merits of appellant’s appeals from the magistrate court’s orders. There is thus no ruling on these matters which we can properly consider, “for ‘this court will review and correct only such error as was made in the trial court. . . . (Cit.)’ [Cit.]” Chrysler Corp. v. Marinari, 182 Ga. App. 399, 403 (3) (355 SE2d 719) (1987).
2. The orders dismissing appellant’s appeals recite that the actions were dismissed because neither appellant nor counsel for appellant responded to the jury calendar calls of those actions. These orders met the requirements of OCGA § 9-11-52 (a) and (b). Scott v. W. S. Badcock Corp., 161 Ga. App. 826 (1) (289 SE2d 769) (1982). Accordingly, appellant’s fourth enumeration presents no ground for reversal of the superior court’s orders.
Judgments affirmed.
Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.
Decided April 3, 1990
Rehearing denied April 19, 1990
Harrison Cronic, pro se.
Campbell, Martin & Manley, David B. Manley III, for appellee.