Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance

N.J.

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Citations: 65 N.J. 152, 319 A.2d 732, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 166

Decision Date: 5/29/1974

Jurisdiction: NJ

Bluebook Citation: Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance, 65 N.J. 152, 319 A.2d 732, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 166 (N.J. 1974)

More Cases: N.J. decisions from 1974


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 4% most-cited · cited by 60 decisions
60
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
13
21
16
2
7
1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.37
N.J.10
N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div.3
D.N.J.2
10th Cir.1
3d Cir.1
Most recently cited by10
  • 2026Mist Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Berkley Insurance Company N.J.
  • 2025John William Myers v. Gny Mutual Insurance Company N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 2024Bridgewater Donuts, LLC v. Geico Indemnity Company N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 2022KYANG H. CARPIO v. NICOLE CHICCHETTI ALLSTATE, ETC. v. JOSEPH M. CALAVANO (L-3563-15, L-1932-17, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 2021SWEETBERRY HOLDINGS LLC v. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. D.N.J.
  • 2020DECORATION DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC. v. AMCOR RIGID PLASTICS USA, INC. E.D. Mich.
  • 2017ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY VS. NEW JERSEY PAN-AFRICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY, INC. VS. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCECOMPANY(L-2320-08, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 2010Flomerfelt v. Cardiello N.J.
  • 2009Livsey v. Mercury Insurance Group N.J.
  • 2009Penn National Insurance v. Costa N.J.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE CO., RICHARD B. HOLCOMBE, ALICE HOLCOMBE AND WILBUR S. HOLCOMBE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. v. THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND MOTOR CLUB FIRE & CASUALTY CO., JACKIE W. EISNER, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. ELMER RICHARD POTENT, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR RICHARD M. POTENT, AN INFANT, ELMER RICHARD POTENT AND CHARLOTTE POTENT, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JACKIE W. EISNER, HALLIE EISNER, ELMER EISNER, SR. AND RICHARD B. HOLCOMBE, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Attorneys

  • Mr. Richard, D. Catenacci, argued the cause for appellant New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company, (McElroy, Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys).
  • Mr. William M. Lake, argued the cause for appellant Continental Insurance Company, (Dietrich, Stockman & Lake, attorneys).
  • Mr. Gerald Kaplan, argued the cause for respondent Motor Club Fire & Casualty Co., and Eisner, etc., (Lieb, Teich & Berlin, attorneys; Jerome S. Lieb on the brief).
  • Mr. Edward B. Meredith, argued the cause for respondents Westchester Fire Insurance Company and Holcombe, (Meredith, Meredith & Chase, attorneys).
  • Mr. Gregory V. Hopkins argued the cause for respondents Potent, (Frank V. Walsh, Jr., attorney).
majority Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., Richard B. Holcombe, Alice Holcombe and Wilbur S. Holcombe v. The Continental Insurance Companies New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., Motor Club Fire & Casualty Co., Jackie W. Eisner, etc., and Elmer Richard Potent, Guardian Ad Litem for Richard M. Potent, an infant, Elmer Richard Potent and Charlotte Potent, individually, vs. Jackie W. Eisner, Haltie Eisner, Elmer Eisner, Sr., and Richard B. Holcombe, Sr., etc, 126 N. J. Super.

For reversal — Hone.

For affirmance — Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, Sullivan and Pashman — 5.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.