Webster v. Fargo
U.S.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 1991Federal Deposit Insurance v. City of New Iberia 5th Cir.
- 1985Bung's Bar & Grille, Inc. v. Township Council N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div.
- 1984Ward v. Ada County Highway District Idaho
- 1977McNally v. Township of Teaneck N.J.
- 1971Fisher v. City of Minot N.D.
- 1961Murphy v. City of Bismarck N.D.
- 1954Gallaher v. City of Fargo N.D.
- 1953Hydrocarbon Production Co. v. Valley Acres Water Dist. 5th Cir.
- 1951Laskey v. Hilty Ohio Ct. App.
- 1948Board of Directors of Red River Levee Dist. No. 1 of Lafayette County v. Reconstruction Finance Corp. 8th Cir.
Cites 1 case
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
WEBSTER v. FARGO.
Attorneys
- Mr. Seth Newman for plaintiff in error. Mr. Burleigh F. Spalding was o.n his brief.
- Mr. S. B. Pinney, Mr. John E. Greene and Mr. H. F. Miller submitted on their brief.
Delivered the opinion of the court.
It is conceded, in this record, that thé plaintiff in error has no ground to complain of any discrimination attempted against him, either in the statutes of the State or in the proceedings thereunder, whereby the tax in question was assessed against his property. The sole contention on his behalf is that, under the decision of this court in the case of Norwood v. Baker, 172 U. S. 269, all special assessments upon the basis of frontage are in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, in that they may reihlt in the taking of property without due process of law.
But we agree with the. Supreme Court of North Dakota in holding that it is within the power of the legislature of the State to create special taxing districts, and to charge the cost of a local improvement, in whole or in part, upon the property in. said districts, either according to valuation, or superficial area, or frontage, and that it was not the intention of this court, in Norwood v. Baker, to hold otherwise.
It is unnecessary to enter upon an examination of the author- - ities, as that has recently been done in the case of French v. Barber Asphalt Company, ante, 324; and, upon the authority of that case, the judgment of the Supreme Court of North Dakota is
Affirmed.,