Vickrey v. American Youth Camps, Inc.
Tex.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2026M-I L.L.C. v. Texas International Terminals, Ltd. Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.]
- 2025Anne Coyle // Stephen Casey v. Chad Walker and Alisha Flood // Cross-Appellee, Anne Coyle Tex. App.
- 2025Sandra L. Sargent v. David L. Sargent Tex. App.
- 2023in the Matter of the Marriage of Michelle Mapuana Mann and Jason R. Mann, and in the Interest of M.K.M. and M.M.M., Children Tex. App.
- 2023Shamim Memon and Discovery MM Services, Inc. v. VY Thuan Nguyen, Individually and Vy Nguyen & Associates, PLLC Tex. App.
- 2022Edward John Glynn v. Cynythia Kay Glynn Tex. App.
- 2022Interest of L.J.L. and J.W.L., Minor Children Tex. App.
- 2022Karen Cernoch v. Frank Cernoch Tex. App.
- 2021Allison Michelle Crowell v. Nathan Andrew Crowell Tex. App.
- 2021Joy Maraio-Wilhoit v. Ronald Edwin Wilhoit Tex. App.
Cites 3 cases
- Wyss v. Bookman
- Vickrey v. American Youth Camps, Inc.
- Edwards v. Gifford
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Betty J. VICKREY, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN YOUTH CAMPS, INC., et al., Respondents.
Attorneys
- Andress, Woodgate & Lodewick, William Andress, Jr., Dallas, for petitioner.
- Vance, McMullen, Connally & Robertson, Steve Robertson, Clifton, for respondents.
American Youth Camps, Inc. and Joe Phillips, Jr., Respondents, brought this action against Betty Vickrey, Petitioner. Respondents sought to prevent Mrs. Vickrey from foreclosing, under a deed of trust, on certain real property to which American Youth Camps claimed title, and to remove the deed of trust as a cloud on American Youth Camps’ title. Asserting breach of promise by Mrs. Vickrey, they further prayed for recovery of certain funds that American Youth Camps had become obligated to pay Mr. Phillips. Mrs. Vickrey filed a cross-action seeking judicial foreclosure. The parties reached a settlement agreement which was dictated in open court pursuant to Rule 11, Tex.R.Civ.P. At a subsequent date, the trial court entered final judgment, referring to and incorporating the earlier settlement agreement. Complaining that it did not conform to the settlement agreement reached by the parties, Mrs. Vickrey appealed from the entry of this final judgment. The court of civil appeals affirmed the final judgment as entered, holding that Mrs. Vickrey’s complaints were without support in the record. 526 S.W.2d 727.
Among other discrepancies complained of, Mrs. Vickrey points out that the settlement agreement provided for Mr. Phillips to receive 63 acres of the property in question and for his execution of a $10,-000 note favoring her, while the final judgment as entered awards the 63 acres to American Youth Camps and requires it, rather than Mr. Phillips, to execute the note. A final judgment which is founded upon a settlement agreement reached by the parties must be in strict or literal compliance with that agreement. Wyss v. Bookman, 235 S.W. 567 (Tex.Comm.App.1921); Edwards v. Gifford, 137 Tex. 559, 155 S.W.2d 786 (1941).
Pursuant to Rule 483, Tex.R.Civ.P., the decision of the court of civil appeals being in conflict with the above cited cases, the application for writ of error is granted and, without hearing oral argument, we reverse the judgment of the court of civil appeals and remand the cause to the trial court.