Vickery v. Village of Saugerties
N.Y.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 110 decisions
110
Citing decisions
2
Authorities cited
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
15
41
33
13
8
1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2025Nkansah v. United States S.D.N.Y.
- 2024K.I. v. Tyagi D. Maryland
- 2024Conlan v. Liberty Mutual Group Inc. S.D.N.Y.
- 2024Satz v. Organization for the Resolution of Agunot Inc. S.D.N.Y.
- 2023Erbey Holding Corporation John R. Erbey Family Limited Partnership v. Blackrock Financial Management, Inc.
- 2023Petrone v. Turner Publishing Company LLC S.D.N.Y.
- 2020Rebecca Bextel and Jonathan Bextel v. Fork Road LLC., a Wyoming Limited Liability Company Albert E. Hancock, III, and Susan A. Hancock Wyo.
- 2020Funk v. Belneftekhim E.D.N.Y
- 2019Olukoya v. Sowore D. Maryland
- 2018United States ex rel. Rubar v. Hayner Hoyt Corp. N.D.N.Y.
Cites 2 cases
- Amsterdam Savings Bank v. City View Management Corp.
- In re the City of New York
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
In the Matter of Harry Vickery, Appellant, v Village of Saugerties, Respondent.
Attorneys
- APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
- Richard J. Goldman for appellant.
- Daniel N. Lamb, Sr., and Harvey Mandelkern for respondent.
majority
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law (see, Matter of City of New York [James St.], 21 NY2d 293; see also, Amsterdam Sav. Bank v City View Mgt. Corp., 45 NY2d 854).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.