V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. v. Clark
D.C. Cir.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by8
- 2026Can Softtech, Inc v. United States Fed. Cl.
- 2007Miller v. Mehltretter W.D.N.Y.
- 1997Abramson v. United States Fed. Cl.
- 1984Dowd v. Calabrese D.D.C.
- 1983Cranford v. Montgomery County Md. Ct. Spec. App.
- 1981United States v. Winner 10th Cir.
- 1980Hamilton v. Verdow Md.
- 1972Verrazzano Trading Corp. v. United States Cust. Ct.
Cites 1 case
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
V. E. B. CARL ZEISS, JENA, Steelmasters, Inc. and Ercona Corporation, Appellants, v. Ramsey CLARK, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Appellee.
Attorneys
- Mr. Harry I. Rand, Washington, D. C., for appellants.
- Mr. John C. Eldridge, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Messrs. David G. Bress, U. S. Atty., and Alan S. Rosenthal, Atty., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for appellee.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.
On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the order of the District Court, appealed from in this cause be, and it is hereby, affirmed for the reasons stated in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, D.D.C., 40 F.R.D. 318 (1966).