United States v. Mayer

9th Cir.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Citations: 560 F.3d 948, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8245, 2009 WL 650411

Decision Date: 3/16/2009

Docket Number: No. 07-30274

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: United States v. Mayer, 560 F.3d 948, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8245, 2009 WL 650411 (9th Cir. 2009)

More Cases: 9th Cir. decisions from 2009

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Casey Dale MAYER, Defendant-Appellant.

Judges

Before: RICHARD C. TALLMAN, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Attorneys

Craig E. Weinerman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Eugene, OR, for the defendant-appellant.
Frank R. Papagni, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Eugene, OR, for the plaintiff-appellee.

majority N.R. SMITH.

Order; Dissent to Order by Chief Judge KOZINKI; Opinion by

N.R. SMITH.

ORDER

The opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on June 30, 2008, and published at 530 F.3d 1099, is WITHDRAWN. The superseding opinion shall be filed concurrently with this order.

Having made the foregoing amendments to the opinion, all judges on the panel have voted to deny Defendant/Appellee’s Petition for Panel Rehearing, and so that petition is DENIED.

The full court has been advised of Defendant/Appellee’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and a judge of this court requested a vote on whether this case should be reheard en banc; however, a majority of the active judges did not vote in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. RApp. P. 35. Accordingly, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.