United States v. Mayer
9th Cir.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2026United States v. Aguilera 9th Cir.
- 2025Cortes N.D. Cal.
- 2025United States v. McKenzie 9th Cir.
- 2024United States v. Hamper 9th Cir.
- 2021United States v. Carlos Zavala-Huerta 9th Cir.
- 2020United States v. Keith Hopkins 9th Cir.
- 2019United States v. Thomas Franco 9th Cir.
- 2019United States v. Michael Gaussiran 9th Cir.
- 2019United States v. Michael Huntoon 9th Cir.
- 2018United States v. Nelson McKee 9th Cir.
Cites 1 case
- United States v. Mayer
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Casey Dale MAYER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges
- Before: RICHARD C. TALLMAN, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys
- Craig E. Weinerman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Eugene, OR, for the defendant-appellant.
- Frank R. Papagni, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Eugene, OR, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Order; Dissent to Order by Chief Judge KOZINKI; Opinion by
N.R. SMITH.
ORDER
The opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on June 30, 2008, and published at 530 F.3d 1099, is WITHDRAWN. The superseding opinion shall be filed concurrently with this order.
Having made the foregoing amendments to the opinion, all judges on the panel have voted to deny Defendant/Appellee’s Petition for Panel Rehearing, and so that petition is DENIED.
The full court has been advised of Defendant/Appellee’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and a judge of this court requested a vote on whether this case should be reheard en banc; however, a majority of the active judges did not vote in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. RApp. P. 35. Accordingly, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.