United States v. Malcolm

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 282 U.S. 792, 75 L. Ed. 714, 51 S. Ct. 184, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 956, 2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 650, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 41, SCDB 1930-112

Decision Date: 1/19/1931

Docket Number: No. 512

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792, 75 L. Ed. 714, 51 S. Ct. 184, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 956, 2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 650, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 41, SCDB 1930-112 (1931)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1931

UNITED STATES v. MALCOLM.

Attorneys

Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, Mr. Sewall Key and Miss Helen B. Carloss, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold submitted for the United States.
Messrs. Kingman Brewster, James S. Y. Ivins, Allen G. Wright, A. J. 'Hill, O. R. Folsom-Jones, Joseph D. Brady, and F. E. Youngman submitted for Malcolm.

majority Pee Curiam.

The first question certified is answered: No. The second question is answered: Yes. Poe v. Seaborn, ante, p. 101; Goodell v. Koch, ante, p. 118; Hopkins v. Bacon, ante, p. 122.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.