United States v. Ceballos-Martinez
10th Cir.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 1% most-cited · cited by 93 decisions
93
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
29
38
26
2000s2010s2020s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2026Jones W.D. Okla.
- 2026Campa W.D. Okla.
- 2026Jerez-Lopez W.D. Okla.
- 2026Singh W.D. Okla.
- 2026Dia W.D. Okla.
- 2025Medina-Juarez v. United States D. Utah
- 2025Escarcega W.D. Okla.
- 2025Holt W.D. Okla.
- 2025Dewayne Clark v. CoreCivic, Inc., et al. W.D. Okla.
- 2025Li W.D. Okla.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando CEBALLOS-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges
- Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, McKAY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
- with whom BRISCOE and LUCERO, Circuit Judges, join.
Attorneys
- Submitted on the briefs: Alonzo J. Padilla, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- David C. Iglesias, United States Attorney, and David N. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, for Defendant-Appellee.
majority
ORDER
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
Upon further consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing, the court called for an en banc poll.
The petition for rehearing was transmitted to the en banc court, which is composed of all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service, and is denied. Judges Henry, Briscoe, Lucero, and Hartz would grant rehearing.