Umans v. United States

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 389 U.S. 80, 19 L. Ed. 2d 255, 88 S. Ct. 253, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2932, SCDB 1967-018

Decision Date: 11/6/1967

Docket Number: No. 41

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Umans v. United States, 389 U.S. 80, 19 L. Ed. 2d 255, 88 S. Ct. 253, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2932, SCDB 1967-018 (1967)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1967


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 50 decisions
50
Citing decisions
1
Authorities cited
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

18
27
3
2
1960s1970s1980s1990s

Courts citing this case

2d Cir.24
E.D.N.Y.3
S.D.N.Y.3
3d Cir.2
5th Cir.2
9th Cir.2
Most recently cited by10
Cites 1 case

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

UMANS v. UNITED STATES.

Judges

  • Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Attorneys

  • Edward Brodsky argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was William Esbitt.
  • Sidney M. Glaser argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg.
majority Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Harlan

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice Harlan

would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Waterman’s opinion for that court in United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.