Umans v. United States
U.S.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 50 decisions
50
Citing decisions
1
Authorities cited
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
18
27
3
2
1960s1970s1980s1990s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 1996United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers D.D.C.
- 1991United States v. Hipkins D. Md.
- 1986Government of Virgin Islands v. Brathwaite 3d Cir.
- 1980United States v. Scotto 2d Cir.
- 1980State v. Anderson Utah
- 1979United States v. Samango 9th Cir.
- 1979People v. Willie Ill. App. Ct.
- 1978United States v. Evans 5th Cir.
- 1978United States v. Niederberger 3d Cir.
- 1978United States v. Fenster E.D. Mich.
Cites 1 case
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
UMANS v. UNITED STATES.
Judges
- Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Attorneys
- Edward Brodsky argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was William Esbitt.
- Sidney M. Glaser argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg.
majority
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Harlan
would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Waterman’s opinion for that court in United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.