Thrifty Shoppers Scrip Co. v. United States

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 389 U.S. 580, 19 L. Ed. 2d 781, 88 S. Ct. 693, 1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,337, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 3135

Decision Date: 1/15/1968

Docket Number: No. 820

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Thrifty Shoppers Scrip Co. v. United States, 389 U.S. 580, 19 L. Ed. 2d 781, 88 S. Ct. 693, 1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,337, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 3135 (1968)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1968


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 8% most-cited · cited by 33 decisions
33
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

4
23
6
1960s1970s1980s

Courts citing this case

9th Cir.3
D. Conn.3
S.D.N.Y.3
C.D. Cal.2
D. Del.2
E.D. Pa.2
Most recently cited by10
  • 1986Union Carbide Corp. v. Michigan Public Service Commission Mich. Ct. App.
  • 1983United States v. G. Heileman Brewing Co. D. Del.
  • 1982Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air v. Pennsylvania 3d Cir.
  • 1982United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. D.D.C.
  • 1981Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation v. Ernst & Ernst E.D.N.Y.
  • 1980Motor Club of America Insurance v. McCroskey Mass. App. Ct.
  • 1978Alaniz v. Tillie Lewis Foods 9th Cir.
  • 1978United States v. Carrols Development Corp. N.D.N.Y.
  • 1977Hawaii-Pacific Venture Capital Corp. v. Rothbard 9th Cir.
  • 1977Associated General Contractors of California v. Secretary of Commerce C.D. Cal.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.

Attorneys

  • David B. Gold for appellant in No. 820. Howard M. Downs for appellants in No. 849.
  • Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Daniel M. Friedman for the United States in both cases. William W. Alsup, Allyn 0. Kreps, Arnold M. Lerman, William E. Mussman and Gordon Johnson for appellees Blue Chip Stamp Co. et al. in both cases.
majority Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.