Szijarto v. Legeman

9th Cir.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Citations: 466 F.2d 864

Decision Date: 8/24/1972

Docket Number: No. 71-2751

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Szijarto v. Legeman, 466 F.2d 864 (9th Cir. 1972)

More Cases: 9th Cir. decisions from 1972

Victor Frank SZIJARTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles F. LEGEMAN, Defendant-Appellee.

Attorneys

  • Victor Frank Szijarto, in pro. per.
  • Charles F. Legeman, in pro. per.
majority PER CURIAM:

We affirm the dismissal of plaintiff’s action.

Plaintiff's claim was one for damages, and purportedly rested upon the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983). His allegations in substance were that defendant, an attorney whom plaintiff had retained, failed to render him reasonable assistance during a state criminal trial, to plaintiff’s injury.

But this Circuit, in common with others, has held that such a claim is not within the purview of the Civil Rights Act, the reason being that an attorney, whether retained or appointed, does not act “under color of” state law. Hence, the claim is not one coming within the jurisdiction of the district court. Dyer v. Rosenberg, 434 F.2d 648 (9th Cir. 1970); Fletcher v. Hook, 446. F.2d 14 (3rd Cir. 1971); Mulligan v. Schlachter, 389 F.2d 231 (6th Cir. 1968); and see French v. Corrigan, 432 F.2d 1211 (7th Cir. 1970).

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.