Syres v. Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 23

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 350 U.S. 892, 76 S. Ct. 152, 100 L. Ed. 785, 37 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2068, 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 430, 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9641, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1469

Decision Date: 11/14/1955

Docket Number: No. 390

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Syres v. Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 23, 350 U.S. 892, 76 S. Ct. 152, 100 L. Ed. 785, 37 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2068, 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 430, 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9641, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1469 (1955)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1955

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 48 decisions

Citing decisions

Authorities cited

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s

Courts citing this case

U.S.10

4th Cir.4

3d Cir.3

5th Cir.2

6th Cir.2

7th Cir.2

Most recently cited by10

2007Banks v. Alexander S.D. Ohio
2006Taylor v. Giant Food Inc. D. Md.
2001Farrow v. Henderson M.D. Fla.
1994Anderson v. California Faculty Ass'n Cal. Ct. App.
1992Sciaraffa v. Oxford Paper Company D. Me.
1989Karahalios v. National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1263 U.S.
1989Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n Local Union No. 6 U.S.
1986Frandsen v. Brotherhood of Railway 7th Cir.
1984Sisco v. Consolidated Rail Corp. 3d Cir.
1983DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters U.S.

Cites 3 cases

Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
Steele v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

Syres et al. v. Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 23, et al.

Attorneys

Roberson L. King for petitioners. Chris Dixie for the Oil Workers International Union, Local 23, et al., and Quentin Keith, David Proctor and Archie D. Cray for the Gulf Oil Corporation, respondents.

majority Per Curiam:

On petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. Steele v. L. & N. R. Co., 323 U. S. 192; Tunstall v. Brotherhood, 323 U. S. 210; Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U. S. 768.