Swift v. Commandant

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 396 U.S. 1028, 90 S. Ct. 578, 24 L. Ed. 2d 524, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 3456

Decision Date: 1/12/1970

Docket Number: No. 391

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Swift v. Commandant, 396 U.S. 1028, 90 S. Ct. 578, 24 L. Ed. 2d 524, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 3456 (1970)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1970


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Frequently CitedTop 11% most-cited · cited by 28 decisions
28
Citing decisions
5
Courts citing

Citations by decade

15
12
1
1970s1980s2000s

Courts citing this case

Ill. App. Ct.21
Ill.4
Conn.1
Md.1
Md. Ct. Spec. App.1
Most recently cited by10
  • 2002State v. O'Neil Conn.
  • 1989People v. Dodds Ill. App. Ct.
  • 1988People v. Evans Ill.
  • 1985People v. Ellis Ill. App. Ct.
  • 1985People v. King Ill. App. Ct.
  • 1983People v. Kubat Ill.
  • 1983People v. Eddington Ill. App. Ct.
  • 1982People v. Olbrot Ill. App. Ct.
  • 1981People v. Monroe Ill. App. Ct.
  • 1981People v. Garcia Ill. App. Ct.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

Swift v. Commandant, U. S. Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth.

Judges

  • Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Attorneys

  • Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Roger A. Pauley for respondent.
majority

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.