Susser v. Carvel Corp.

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 381 U.S. 125, 85 S. Ct. 1364, 14 L. Ed. 2d 284, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2448, SCDB 1964-104

Decision Date: 5/3/1965

Docket Number: No. 355

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Susser v. Carvel Corp., 381 U.S. 125, 85 S. Ct. 1364, 14 L. Ed. 2d 284, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2448, SCDB 1964-104 (1965)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1965


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 2% most-cited · cited by 73 decisions
73
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

9
36
21
6
1
1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s

Courts citing this case

2d Cir.6
S.D.N.Y.6
5th Cir.5
E.D.N.Y.5
8th Cir.4
Conn.4
Most recently cited by10
  • 2007Drug Mart Pharmacy Corp. v. American Home Products Corp. E.D.N.Y.
  • 1996De Jesus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 2d Cir.
  • 1994State v. Patterson Conn.
  • 1993State v. Patterson Conn. App. Ct.
  • 1992Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp. N.J.
  • 1990Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp. N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
  • 1990Burkert v. Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc. Conn.
  • 1988Pierce v. Commercial Warehouse M.D. Fla.
  • 1987Mozart Co. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. 9th Cir.
  • 1987Kellam Energy, Inc. v. Duncan D. Del.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

SUSSER et al. v. CARVEL CORP. et al.

Judges

  • Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the decision of this case.

Attorneys

  • Arnold Fleischmann argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Sidney W. Rothstein and Robert G. Levy.
  • Herman L. Weisman and John A. Wilson argued the cause for respondents. With Mr. Weisman on the briefs for Carvel Corp. et al. were Herbert F. Roth and Lester G. Renard. With Mr. Wilson on the brief for H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., was Willard M. L. Robinson. Albert L. Wigor filed a brief for Eagle Cone Corp. William G. Mulligan and Doris Carroll filed a brief for Rakestraw’s Dairy Products, Inc.
  • J err old G. Van Cise filed a brief for the International Franchise Association, Inc., as amicus curiae.
majority Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the decision of this case.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.