Stewart v. Salamon
U.S.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2021Walid Jammal v. American Family Ins Co 6th Cir.
- 2019Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. v. BP Exploration & Prod., Inc. (In re Deepwater Horizon) 5th Cir.
- 2009Auger v. Town of Strafford N.H.
- 1991Claire Rand, Custodian for Brett Rand v. Monsanto Company 7th Cir.
- 1979Scates v. Arizona Corp. Commission Ariz. Ct. App.
- 1975Snell v. Ruppert Wyo.
- 1966Rhodes v. Houston D. Neb.
- 1966United States ex rel. Townsend v. Ogilvie 7th Cir.
- 1959Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. 6th Cir.
- 1957Davis v. United States 5th Cir.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Stewart v. Salamon.
Attorneys
- Mr. Philip Phillips in support of the motion.
- Mr. Alexander H. Stephens and Mr. Charles P. Culver, contra.
Delivered the opinion of the court.
An appeal will not be entertained by this court from a decree entered in the circuit or other inferior court, in exact accordance with our mandate upon a previous appeal. Such a decree, when entered, is in effect our decree, and the appeal would be from ourselves to ourselves. If such an appeal is. taken, however, we will, upon the application • of the appellee, examine the decree entered, and if it conforms to the mandate, dismiss the ease with costs. If it does not, the case will be remanded with appropriate directions for the correction of the error. The same rule applies to writs of error. This is not intended to interfere with any remedy the parties may have by mandamus.
This is an appeal from a decree entered upon our mandate. No complaint is made as to its form, and it seems to be in all respects according to our directions. The effort of the appellant was to open the case below, and to obtain leave to file new pleadings, introducing new defences. This- he could not do. The rights of the parties in the subject-matter of the suit were finally determined upon the original appeal, and all that remained for the Circuit Court to do was to enter a decree in accordance with our instructions, and carry it into effect. If in the progress of the execution of the decree, after its entry, either party is aggrieved, he may appeal from the final decree in that behalf; but such an appeal will bring up for re-examination only the proceedings subsequent to the mandate.
The appeal will be dismissed with costs; and it is
So ordered.