Steeple Oil & Gas Corp. v. Amend

Tex.

Court: Supreme Court of Texas

Citations: 9 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 12, 394 S.W.2d 789, 23 Oil & Gas Rep. 465, 1965 Tex. LEXIS 329

Decision Date: 10/6/1965

Docket Number: No. A-10973

Jurisdiction: TX

Bluebook Citation: Steeple Oil & Gas Corp. v. Amend, 9 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 12, 394 S.W.2d 789, 23 Oil & Gas Rep. 465, 1965 Tex. LEXIS 329 (Tex. 1965)

More Cases: Tex. decisions from 1965


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 8% most-cited · cited by 45 decisions
45
Citing decisions
2
Authorities cited
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
11
3
3
26
1
1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s

Courts citing this case

Tex. App.31
Tex. Civ. App.11
Tex.3
Most recently cited by10
  • 2018Devon Energy Production Company, L.P., F/K/A GeoSouthern Dewitt Properties, LLC, BHP Billiton Petroleum Properties (N.A.), LP F/K/A Petrohawk Properties LP, GeoSouthern Energy Corporation, and Petrohawk Energy Corporation v. Michael A. Sheppard, Constance S. Kirk, Jennifer S. Badger, Frank B. Sheppard, James K. Crain, Christopher M. Crain, James K. Crain, III, Patrick G. Crain, and Shirley R. Crain Tex. App.
  • 2008Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Sheppard Tex.
  • 2008Louis Madrid v. State Tex. App.
  • 2007Elizabeth Gutierrez v. Zurich American Insurance Company as Subrogee of Hunter Industries, Inc. and Johnnie Hill Tex. App.
  • 2006Juan Mario Villafani, M.D. v. Adela Trejo Tex. App.
  • 2006Lorenzo Gomez, as the and Representative of the Estate of Agapito Gomez v. Texas Windstorm Insurance Association Tex. App.
  • 2006in the Interest of C.L.W. and H.A.W., Minor Children Tex. App.
  • 2005Joel T. Pena and Ernesto Pena, Jr. v. M.K. Tidwell Commercial Realty, Ltd. Tex. App.
  • 2005Zuniga v. Navarro & Associates, P.C. Tex. App.
  • 2005Guy Williams, D/B/A Freedom Bail Bonds v. State Tex. App.
Cites 2 cases

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

STEEPLE OIL AND GAS CORPORATION and Raymond A. Baur, Petitioners, v. J. D. AMEND, Respondent.

Attorneys

  • Henry Klepak and Roy J. True, Dallas, for petitioners.
  • Simpson, Adkins, Fullingim & Hankins, Amarillo, for respondent.
majority PER CURIAM.

Petitioners have attempted to appeal from a partial summary judgment without a severance of the other issues between the parties. Since the judgment is interlocutory and not appealable, under our holding in Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Company, 159 Tex. 550, 324 S.W.2d 200 (1959), neither this Court nor the Court of Civil Appeals has power to review it. We accordingly reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and dismiss the appeal. McCauley v. Consolidated Underwriters, 157 Tex. 475, 304 S.W.2d 265 (1957).

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.