State v. Winstead
Ohio
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 78 decisions
78
Citing decisions
4
Courts citing
Citations by decade
2
32
27
17
1990s2000s2010s2020s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2025State v. Guffie Ohio Ct. App.
- 2025State v. Parker Ohio Ct. App.
- 2025State v. Haynik Ohio Ct. App.
- 2024State v. Wilson Ohio Ct. App.
- 2024State v. Easterly Ohio Ct. App.
- 2024State v. Goodykoontz Ohio Ct. App.
- 2023State v. Cutlip Ohio Ct. App.
- 2023State v. Dudas Ohio Ct. App.
- 2023State v. Carano Ohio Ct. App.
- 2022State v. Dudas Ohio Ct. App.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Winstead, Appellant.
Judges
- Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Attorneys
- Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip R. Cummings, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
- David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, and Hyrum J. Mackay, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
majority
The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. We agree that a courier’s delay in delivery is not “good cause” for accepting an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening that is untimely filed. Moreover, there is. no denial of due process or equal protection in applying to this appellant a rule applicable to all appellants.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.