State v. Morgan

N.C.

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina

Citations: 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E.2d 166, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 453

Decision Date: 5/22/1946

Jurisdiction: NC

Bluebook Citation: State v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E.2d 166, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 453 (N.C. 1946)

More Cases: N.C. decisions from 1946

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 59 decisions

Citing decisions

Authorities cited

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

N.C.48

N.C. Ct. App.7

N.C. App. Ct.2

D.C.1

M.D.N.C.1

Most recently cited by10

2024State v. Singleton N.C.
2018State v. Langley N.C.
2017State v. Murrell N.C.
2017State v. Everrette N.C. App. Ct.
2016State v. Brice N.C. App. Ct.
1982State v. Lewis N.C. Ct. App.
1981State v. Brunson N.C. Ct. App.
1981State v. Froneberger N.C. Ct. App.
1978State v. Holmon N.C. Ct. App.
1977State v. Perry N.C.

Cites 22 casesshowing 8

State v. Johnson
State v. Lewis
State v. McKnight
State v. Anderson
State v. Hunt
State v. Ellis
State v. Rawls
State v. Bell

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

STATE v. CLARENCE MORGAN.

Attorneys

Attorney-General McMullen and Assistant Attorneys-General Rhodes, Moody, and Tucker for the State.
Wm. E. Comer for defendant, appellant.

majority Barnhill, J.

The defendant does not bring forward his exception to the denial of his motion in arrest of judgment. Even so it raises a jurisdictional question which compels our attention. S. v. Clarke, 220 N. C., 392, 17 S. E. (2d), 468.

It is a universal rule that no indictment, whether at common law or under a statute, can be good if it does not accurately and clearly allege all the constituent elements of the offense charged. S. v. Johnson, 188 N. C., 591, 125 S. E., 183.

A valid warrant or indictment is an essential of jurisdiction. S. v. Beasley, 208 N. C., 318, 180 S. E., 598; S. v. Rawls, 203 N. C., 436, 166 S. E., 332; S. v. Banks, 206 N. C., 479, 174 S. E., 806. Hence, where no crime is charged in the warrant or bill of indictment upon which the defendant has been tried and convicted the judgment must be arrested. S. v. Johnson, ante, 266; S. v. Vanderlip, 225 N. C., 610; S. v. Clarke, supra; S. v. McLamb, 214 N. C., 322, 199 S. E., 81; S. v. Tarlton, 208 N. C., 734, 182 S. E., 481; S. v. Tyson, 208 N. C., 231, 180 S. E., 85; S. v. Cook, 207 N. C., 261, 176 S. E., 757; S. v. Lewis, 194 N. C., 620, 140 S. E., 434; S. v. Anderson, 196 N. C., 771, 147 S. E., 305; S. v. Brady, 177 N. C., 587, 99 S. E., 7; S. v. McKnight, 196 N. C., 259, 145 S. E., 281.

Under G. S., 49-2, the neglect or refusal to support an illegitimate child must hfi,willful and it must be so charged in the warrant or bill of indictment. The omission of such allegation is fatal. S. v. Vanderlip, supra; S. v. Hayden, 224 N. C., 779; S. v. McLamb, supra; S. v. Clarke, supra; S. v. Tarlton, supra; S. v. Tyson, supra; S. v. Cook, supra.

When a fatal defect disclosing want of jurisdiction appears on the face of the record this Court, in the absence of a motion, will stay further proceedings ex mero motu. S. v. Clarke, supra; Shepard v. Leonard, 223 N. C., 110, 25 S. E. (2d), 445.

Such action does not prejudice the defendant, for a void warrant will not support a plea of former jeopardy upon a subsequent trial. S. v. Ellis, 200 N. C., 77, 156 S. E., 157; S. v. Bell, 205 N. C., 225, 171 S. E., 50; S. v. Beasley, supra.

The State did not exercise its right to amend. S. v. Goff, 205 N. C., 545, 172 S. E., 407; S. v. Walker, 179 N. C., 730, 102 S. E., 404; S. v. Hurd, 197 N. C., 707, 150 S. E., 353. The warrant as it appears in the record charges no criminal offense. Hence the court below was without power or authority to pronounce judgment.

Judgment arrested.