State v. Cooey
Ohio
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 2% most-cited · cited by 101 decisions
101
Citing decisions
4
Courts citing
Citations by decade
2
50
40
9
1990s2000s2010s2020s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2024State v. Wilson Ohio Ct. App.
- 2024State v. Goodykoontz Ohio Ct. App.
- 2023State v. Dudas Ohio Ct. App.
- 2023State v. Carano Ohio Ct. App.
- 2022State v. Dudas Ohio Ct. App.
- 2022State v. Preston Ohio Ct. App.
- 2022State v. Burks Ohio Ct. App.
- 2021State v. Thompson Ohio Ct. App.
- 2021State v. Morton Ohio Ct. App.
- 2018State v. Congress Ohio Ct. App.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Cooey, Appellant.
Judges
- Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
- Cook, J., not participating.
Attorneys
- Maureen O’Connor, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and William D. Wellemeyer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
- David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, Cynthia A. Yost and William S. Lazarow, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.
majority
Appellant has failed to show good cause for the untimely filing of his application to reopen. See State v. Reddick (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88, 647 N.E.2d 784. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Cook, J., not participating.