State v. Clay

Ohio

Court: Supreme Court of Ohio

Citations: 34 Ohio St. 2d 250, 63 Ohio Op. 2d 391, 298 N.E.2d 137, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 377

Decision Date: 6/20/1973

Docket Number: No. 72-748

Jurisdiction: OH

Bluebook Citation: State v. Clay, 34 Ohio St. 2d 250, 63 Ohio Op. 2d 391, 298 N.E.2d 137, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 377 (Ohio 1973)

More Cases: Ohio decisions from 1973

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Clay, Appellant.

Judges

0 ’Neill, C. J., Heebeet, Cobeigan, Steen, Celebeezze, W. Beown and P. Beown, JJ., concur.

Attorneys

Mr. Michael Nolan, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.
Messrs, Lavelle & Yamity and Mr. L. Alan Goldsberry, for appellant.

majority Per Curiam.

An examination of the record fails to disclose misconduct on the part of the prosecutor. Certainly there was no affirmative showing by appellant that he was entitled to a new trial. The jury resolved the facts of the case and determined the credibility of the witnesses before it, which was its responsibility. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of that court (29 Ohio App. 2d 206)..

Judgment affirmed.

0 ’Neill, C. J., Heebeet, Cobeigan, Steen, Celebeezze, W. Beown and P. Beown, JJ., concur.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.