State v. Brandenburg

Ohio

Court: Supreme Court of Ohio

Citations: 146 Ohio St. 3d 221, 2016 Ohio 2970, 2016-Ohio-2970

Decision Date: 5/17/2016

Docket Number: Nos. 2015-1330 and 2015-1489

Jurisdiction: OH

Bluebook Citation: State v. Brandenburg, 146 Ohio St. 3d 221, 2016 Ohio 2970, 2016-Ohio-2970 (Ohio 2016)

More Cases: Ohio decisions from 2016

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Brandenburg, Appellant.

Judges

  • O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Attorneys

  • Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lina N. Akam-hawi, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
  • Charles M. Conliff, for appellant.
majority

{¶ 1} In State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231, we held that R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) allows an appellate court to increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law or (2) unsupported by the record. Id. at ¶ 7.

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lina N. Akam-hawi, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Charles M. Conliff, for appellant.

‘{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals in the instant case is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Marcum.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.