State v. Andrews

Alaska

Court: Alaska Supreme Court

Citations: 723 P.2d 85, 1986 Alas. LEXIS 367

Decision Date: 8/8/1986

Docket Number: Nos. S-1172, S-1192

Jurisdiction: AK

Bluebook Citation: State v. Andrews, 723 P.2d 85, 1986 Alas. LEXIS 367 (Alaska 1986)

More Cases: Alaska decisions from 1986

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 4% most-cited · cited by 67 decisions

Citing decisions

Authorities cited

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

Alaska Ct. App.59

Alaska6

Ariz. Ct. App.1

N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.1

Most recently cited by10

2020Nathanial L. Kangas v. State of Alaska Alaska Ct. App.
2019Jason D. Ray v. State of Alaska Alaska Ct. App.
2012Ward v. State, Department of Public Safety Alaska
2008Smith v. State Alaska Ct. App.
2006State v. Stafford Alaska Ct. App.
2006State v. Parker Alaska
2006Cooper v. Cooper Alaska
2005Baker v. State Alaska Ct. App.
2005Paige v. State Alaska Ct. App.
2005Edmonds v. State Alaska Ct. App.

Cites 1 case

State v. Andrews

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

STATE of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Peter ANDREWS, Sr., and George R. Koenig, Respondents. STATE of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Harry N. COFFEY, Respondent.

Judges

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.

Attorneys

Cynthia M. Hora, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anchorage and Harold M. Brown, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for petitioner.
John M. Murtagh, Anchorage, for respondent Andrews.
Laurel J. Peterson, Laurel J. Peterson, P.C., Anchorage, for respondent Koenig.
A. Michael Zahare, Bradbury, Bliss, & Riordan, Inc., Anchorage, for respondent Coffey.

majority PER CURIAM.

The issue in these consolidated cases is the proper interpretation of AS 12.55.025(e) and (g). The State contends that an offender convicted of separate counts of sexual assault must be sentenced to consecutive, rather than concurrent, terms. Having made a thorough examination of the matter, we have concluded that the opinion of the court of appeals in State v. Andrews, 707 P.2d 900 (Alaska App.1985), correctly treats and disposes of the issues involved, and we adopt such opinion as the opinion of this court.