State ex rel. Harris v. Rhodes

Ohio

Court: Supreme Court of Ohio

Citations: 54 Ohio St. 2d 41, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 36, 374 N.E.2d 641, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 530

Decision Date: 4/12/1978

Docket Number: No. 77-1207

Jurisdiction: OH

Bluebook Citation: State ex rel. Harris v. Rhodes, 54 Ohio St. 2d 41, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 36, 374 N.E.2d 641, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 530 (Ohio 1978)

More Cases: Ohio decisions from 1978


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 1% most-cited · cited by 128 decisions
128
Citing decisions
1
Authorities cited
4
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
29
12
63
14
9
1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

Ohio Ct. App.98
Ohio27
Ohio App. Ct.2
6th Cir.1
Most recently cited by10
  • 2024State ex rel. Crenshaw v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2023State ex rel. Hemmons v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2023State ex rel. Collins v. Kilbane Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2022Fipps v. Day Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2022State v. Collins Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2022State ex. rel. Crenshaw v. E. Cleveland Fin. Dept. Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2021Beverly v. Clancy Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2021State ex rel. Standifer v. Cleveland Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2020In re Wesley v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas Ohio Ct. App.
  • 2018Graham v. City of Lakewood Ohio App. Ct.
Cites 1 case

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

The State, ex rel. Harris, v. Rhodes, Governor, et al.

Judges

  • O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brows,’ P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Attorneys

  • Mr. Christopher Harris, pro se.
  • Mr. William J. Brown, attorney general, and Mr. Allen P. Adler, for respondents.
majority Per Curiam.

In order to he entitled to a writ of man-damns, relator must show (1) that he has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, (2) that respondents are under a clear legal duty to perform the acts, and (3) that relator has no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. National City Bank, v. Bd. of Education (1977), 52 Ohio St. 2d 81.

Relator asserts that the requested records are “public records” which, pursuant to R. C. 149.43, “shall be open at all reasonable times for inspection.”

However, the requested records are not public records under R. C. 149.43, which states, in part:

“‘[P]ublic record’ means any record required to be kept by any governmental unit * * * except records pertaining to physical or psychiatric examinations, * * * probation and parole proceedings, and records the release of which is prohibited by state * * * law.” (Emphasis added.)

Records and files of prisoners are compiled pursuant to R. C. 5145.04, 5145.20 and 5145.22. These records are maintained under R. C. 5120.21, which states, in part:

“The department of rehabilitation and correction shall keep in its office, accessible only to its employees, * * * a record showing the name, residence, sex, age, nativity, occupation, condition, and date of entrance or commitment of every inmate in the several institutions governed by it * * *.” (Emphasis added.)

Relator has shown no clear legal right to the relief prayed for. Therefore, the writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ.denied.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brows,’ P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.