Sharon GG. v. Duane HH.

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 63 N.Y.2d 859, 482 N.Y.S.2d 270, 472 N.E.2d 46, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4657

Decision Date: 10/11/1984

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: Sharon GG. v. Duane HH., 63 N.Y.2d 859, 482 N.Y.S.2d 270, 472 N.E.2d 46, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4657 (1984)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1984

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 6% most-cited · cited by 56 decisions

Citing decisions

Authorities cited

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

N.Y. App. Div.38

N.Y. Fam. Ct.10

N.Y.3

N.Y. Fam. Ct., Bronx Cty.1

N.Y. Fam. Ct., Erie Cty.1

N.Y. Fam. Ct., Nassau Cty.1

Most recently cited by10

2024L.T. v. C.C. N.Y. Fam. Ct., Erie Cty.
2018Matter of Joseph O. v. Danielle B. N.Y. App. Div.
2018Matter of K.G. v. C.H. N.Y. App. Div.
2018Matter of Christopher YY. v. Jessica ZZ. N.Y. App. Div.
2017Beth R. v. Ronald S. N.Y. App. Div.
2015In re Jonathan C. N.Y. Fam. Ct.
2011Nathan O. v. Jennifer P. N.Y. App. Div.
2010Jason E. v. Tania G. N.Y. App. Div.
2010Edward WW. v. Diana XX. N.Y. App. Div.
2009H.M. v. E.T. N.Y. App. Div.

Cites 1 case

Sharon GG. v. Duane HH.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

In the Matter of Sharon GG., Appellant, v Duane HH. et al., Respondents.

Attorneys

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Donald, M. Sukloff for appellant.
Richard N. Aswad for Michael GG., respondent.
James C. Gacioch for Duane HH., respondent, precluded.

majority

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Howard A. Levine (95 AD2d 466).

In view of the grounds on which we affirm we have no reason to consider or decide whether, pursuant to section 532 of the Family Court Act, a wife may ever compel a blood test of her husband nor do we consider whether the best interests of the child may require the court to compel the husband to submit to a blood test.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur; Judge Wachtler taking no part.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.