Searles v. Manhattan Railway Co.

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 101 N.Y. 661, 56 Sickels 661, 5 N.E. 66, 1886 N.Y. LEXIS 753

Decision Date: 3/2/1886

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: Searles v. Manhattan Railway Co., 101 N.Y. 661, 56 Sickels 661, 5 N.E. 66, 1886 N.Y. LEXIS 753 (1886)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1886


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 1% most-cited · cited by 128 decisions
128
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing

Citations by decade

18
34
34
14
15
5
4
2
1
1
1880s1890s1900s1910s1920s1930s1940s1950s1960s1980s

Courts citing this case

N.Y. App. Div.23
N.Y. Gen. Term17
Mo.9
N.Y. Sup. Ct.8
N.Y.7
N.Y. Super. Ct.5
Most recently cited by10
  • 1984Challis Irrigation Co. v. State Idaho Ct. App.
  • 1963Dent v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. Idaho
  • 1950Magic Empire Express Co. v. Yellow Dime Cab Co. Okla.
  • 1950Messing v. State N.Y. Ct. Cl.
  • 1947Marcoux v. Collins N.H.
  • 1942Gerber v. Faber Cal. Dist. Ct. App.
  • 1942Gerhart v. Southern California Gas Co. Cal. Dist. Ct. App.
  • 1941Hendricks v. McCausey Mich.
  • 1938Law v. Gallegher Del.
  • 1937C. F. Hamblen, Inc. v. Owens Fla.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

Erastus B. Searles, Respondent, v. Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant.

Judges

  • All concur, except Danforth, J., dissenting, and Sapallo, J., taking no part.

Attorneys

  • Edward 8. Rapadlo for appellant.
  • Lewis J. Morrison for respondent.
majority Earl, J.,

Reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur, except Danforth, J., dissenting, and Sapallo, J., taking no part.

J udgment reversed.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.