Scholle v. Hare

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 369 U.S. 429, 82 S. Ct. 910, 8 L. Ed. 2d 1, SCDB 1961-057, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1388

Decision Date: 4/23/1962

Docket Number: No. 22

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Scholle v. Hare, 369 U.S. 429, 82 S. Ct. 910, 8 L. Ed. 2d 1, SCDB 1961-057, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1388 (1962)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1962

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 8% most-cited · cited by 25 decisions

Citing decisions

Authorities cited

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1960s1990s2010s

Courts citing this case

Mich.3

U.S.3

Md.2

D. Colo.1

D. Conn.1

D. Minn.1

Most recently cited by10

2018Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Sec'y of State Mich. App. Ct.
2018Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State Mich. Ct. App.
2011Wilson v. Fallin Okla.
1992Neff v. Secretary of State Mich.
1966Preisler v. Secretary of State W.D. Mo.
1965Kruidenier v. McCulloch Iowa
1964Reynolds v. Sims U.S.
1964In re Apportionment of State Legislature-1964 Mich.
1964Butterworth v. Dempsey D. Conn.
1964Honsey v. Donovan D. Minn.

Cites 1 case

Baker v. Carr

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

SCHOLLE v. HARE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al.

Judges

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Attorneys

Theodore Sachs for appellant.
Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Joseph R. Bilitzke, Solicitor General, Samuel J. Torina, former Solicitor General, Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Leon S. Cohan, Deputy Attorney General, and G. Douglas Clapperton, Assistant Attorney General, for James M. Hare, Secretary of State of Michigan, appellee. Edmund E. Shepherd entered an appearance for Frank D. Beadle et al., appellees.
Melvin Nord and Harold Norris filed a brief, as amici curiae, in support of appellant.

majority Per Curiam.

The judgment is vacated and the ease is remanded to the Supreme Court of Michigan for further consideration in the light of Baker v. Carr, 369 U. S. 186.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.