Schackman v. Arnebergh
U.S.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 46 decisions
46
Citing decisions
2
Authorities cited
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
13
30
2
1
1960s1970s1980s1990s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 1992In re Slagle U.S.
- 1988Foster v. Walsh 6th Cir.
- 1982Backus v. Spears 4th Cir.
- 1976Knight v. Alsop 8th Cir.
- 1976Wilson v. Edelman 7th Cir.
- 1975Weiser v. White 5th Cir.
- 1975Stone v. Philbrook 2d Cir.
- 1975Feinberg v. Federal Deposit Insurance D.C. Cir.
- 1974Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren 7th Cir.
- 1974Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit Union U.S.
Cites 2 cases
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein
- Buchanan v. Rhodes
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
SCHACKMAN et al. v. ARNEBERGH, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.
Attorneys
- Burton Marks for appellants.
- Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Bourke Jones and Robert B. Burns for appellees Arnebergh et al.; Harold W. Kennedy, George Wakefield and Martin E. Weekes for appellees Younger et al.; and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, pro se, and A. Barry Cappello, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Lynch.
majority
Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §§ 2281-2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U. S. 713, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U. S. 3.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.