Rottkamp v. Young

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 15 N.Y.2d 831, 257 N.Y.S.2d 944, 205 N.E.2d 866, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1598

Decision Date: 2/11/1965

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: Rottkamp v. Young, 15 N.Y.2d 831, 257 N.Y.S.2d 944, 205 N.E.2d 866, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1598 (1965)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1965

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 95 decisions

Citing decisions

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

N.Y. App. Div.60

N.Y.10

N.Y. Ct. Cl.9

N.Y. Sup. Ct.8

S.D.N.Y.4

9th Cir.1

Most recently cited by10

2024Penfield Place, LLC v. Dwyer Architectural, LLC N.Y. Sup. Monroe
2016Crvelin v. Board of Education N.Y. App. Div.
2015Sharp v. Incorporated Village N.Y. App. Div.
2014Drever v. State N.Y. Ct. Cl.
2013Applewhite v. Accuhealth, Inc. N.Y.
2009Nazario v. State N.Y. Ct. Cl.
2007Kay v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes 9th Cir.
2005F.A.S.A. Construction Corp. v. Village of Monroe N.Y. App. Div.
2005P&N Tiffany Properties, Inc. v. Maron N.Y. App. Div.
2004Yan Shou Kong v. Town of Huntington N.Y. App. Div.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

Joseph Rottkamp et al., Appellants, v. John C. Young et al., Respondents. Louis Lambran et al., Appellants, v. John C. Young et al., Respondents.

Attorneys

William J. White and Harry Rosenberg for appellants.
John A. Morhous, Town Attorney (George B. Schneider of counsel), for respondents.

majority

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Judges Dye, Fuld, Sceleppi and Bergan. Judge Burke dissents and votes to reverse and reinstate the order of Special Term in the following opinion in which Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Van Voorhis concur.