Rosser v. Squier
Tex.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2026In Re A.T. v. the State of Texas Tex. App.-San Antonio
- 2026Joey Hernandez v. Dulce Estrella Casas Tex. App.-San Antonio
- 2023in Re Donovan Mittlelsted Tex. App.
- 2022in Re Walter Lynn Johnston, Relator Tex. App.
- 2022in Re D.L. Tex. App.
- 2022in the Interest of C.R.G.P, a Minor Child Tex. App.
- 2020Runnels v. Sheriff, Gregg County E.D. Tex.
- 2020in Re: Susan Gail Perrilloux Tex. App.
- 2019in the Guardianship of Hortencia T. Vara, an Incapacitated Person Tex. App.
- 2019in the Interest of N.J.L., J.B.L., and I.J.L. Tex. App.
Cites 5 cases
- Kidd v. Lance
- Ex parte Williams
- Ex parte Carey
- Deramus v. Thornton
- Ex parte Campbell
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Thomas Johnson ROSSER, Relator, v. The Honorable James D. SQUIER, Judge, Respondent.
Attorneys
- Herbert Neil Lackshin, Houston, for relator.
- Reginald A. Hirsch, Houston, Dennis B. Kelly, The Law Offices of Dennis B. Kelly,
- Stewart W. Gagnon, Fulbright & JaworsM, Houston, for respondent.
Nancy Jean Rosser filed a contempt motion against her former husband, Thomas Johnson Rosser, alleging six counts of contempt. After notice and hearing, the trial court convicted Thomas of all six counts of contempt, and assessed no confinement, but as punishment assessed a fine of $45,000.00 payable to a third party. Thomas seeks mandamus relief against this order and related orders.
Habeas corpus relief is not available because there is no physical restraint. Ex parte Williams, 690 S.W.2d 243 (Tex.1985). To the extent that Thomas seeks mandamus relief from a fine assessed under a contempt order because the excessive amount of the fine was void, this court will entertain mandamus jurisdiction. Deramus v. Thornton, 160 Tex. 494, 333 S.W.2d 824 (1960); see also Kidd v. Lance, 794 S.W.2d 586, 587 n. 1 (Tex.App.—Austin 1990, orig. proceeding). Under Tex. Gov’t Code § 21.002(b), the trial court lacks jurisdiction to assess a fine of more than $500 for each contempt. Ex parte Carey, 704 S.W.2d 13, 14 (Tex.1986); Ex parte Campbell, 417 S.W.2d 585 (Tex.1967). The fine beyond the maximum is void. For six counts, the maximum fine is $3,000.00.
Without hearing argument, a majority of the court conditionally grants the writ of mandamus directing Judge Squier to reduce the fine to $3,000 payable to the court, because his contempt judgment conflicts with Tex.Gov’t Code § 21.002(b), Ex parte Carey, and Ex parte Campbell. Tex.R.App.P. 122. All relief not expressly granted is denied.