Ross v. Common Pleas Court
Ohio
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2025State v. Gibbons Ohio Ct. App.
- 2023State v. Wilson Ohio Ct. App.
- 2019State v. Starling Ohio Ct. App.
- 2018State v. Watson Ohio App. Ct.
- 2017State v. Hull Ohio Ct. App.
- 2015State v. Rogers Ohio
- 2014State v. Jackson Ohio Ct. App.
- 2013State v. Wright Ohio Ct. App.
- 2013State v. Bennett Ohio Ct. App.
- 2013State v. Weaver Ohio Ct. App.
Cites 2 cases
- Freeman v. Maxwell
- Crockett v. Haskins
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Ross v. Common Pleas Court of Auglaize County.
Judges
- 0 ’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.
Attorneys
- Mr. Ralph Ross, in propria persona.
- Mr. H. Michael Moser, prosecuting attorney, for respondent.
Habeas corpus is not available where it appears that the sentencing court had jurisdiction to render the judgment of conviction. Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4. In this case, petitioner makes no claim of lack of jurisdiction by the respondent court.
Moreover, petitioner does not allege that his guilty plea, entered while he was represented by counsel, was not voluntary. “A defendant who enters a voluntary plea of guilty while represented by competent counsel waives all nonjurisdictional defects in prior stages of the proceedings.” Crockett v. Haskins (1966), 372 F. 2d 475.
The motion to dismiss the complaint is sustained and the writ is denied.
Writ denied.
0 ’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.