Rosenthal & Co. v. Rothwell Cotton Co.

7th Cir.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Citations: 835 F.2d 710, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18315, 1987 WL 25189

Decision Date: 12/11/1987

Docket Number: No. 86-1510

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Rosenthal & Co. v. Rothwell Cotton Co., 835 F.2d 710, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18315, 1987 WL 25189 (7th Cir. 1987)

More Cases: 7th Cir. decisions from 1987

ROSENTHAL & COMPANY, a partnership, and FGL Commodity Services, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ROTHWELL COTTON COMPANY, INC., a Texas Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Judges

Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and FLAUM, Circuit Judge and REYNOLDS, Senior District Judge .

majority

ORDER

On consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc filed in the above-entitled cause by Defendant-Appellant Rothwell Cotton Company, Inc., no judge in active service has requested a vote thereon, and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is, DENIED.

In addition, the court amends its opinion of August 24, 1987 as follows:

Footnote 1, on page 249, should read as follows: delete everything after “reconsider in the district court.” on page 6; insert instead: “ ‘Arguments not raised in the briefs are waived....’ United States v. Hornick, 815 F.2d 1156, 1159 (7th Cir.1987) (citation omitted). Because Rothwell ignored this contention until oral argument, the court will not consider what role, if any, Rosenthal’s “judicial admission” played in this action.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.