Robillard v. Robbins
N.Y.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2025Matter of Jamila-Kai M.R. v. Lonnie L.M. N.Y. App. Div.
- 2019Matter of Natalya M. v. Chanan M. N.Y. App. Div.
- 2019Matter of Jurgita C. v. Manuel O. N.Y. App. Div.
- 2009Peguero v. 601 Realty Corp. N.Y. App. Div.
- 2001Deyo v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc. N.Y. App. Div.
- 2000Ellsworth v. Chan N.Y. App. Div.
- 1999Rivera v. Majuk N.Y. App. Div.
- 1998Barrowman v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. N.Y. App. Div.
- 1998Padilla v. Style Management Co. N.Y. App. Div.
- 1997Hawkey v. Jefferson Motors, Inc. N.Y. App. Div.
Cites 2 cases
- Wightman v. Campbell
- Gonzalez v. State Liquor Authority
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Margaret M. Robillard, Respondent, v Dean Robbins, III, et al., Appellants.
Attorneys
- APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
- James L. Pemberton for appellants.
- Harold D. Gordon for respondent.
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
While defendants urge that it was error to allow plaintiffs medical expert to express opinions on the very questions to be resolved by the jury, their general objections were insufficient to preserve a law issue for our review (see, Matter of Gonzalez v State Liq. Auth., 30 NY2d 108, 112-113; Wightman v Campbell, 217 NY 479, 482-483).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.