Pugach v. Dollinger

U.S.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Citations: 365 U.S. 458, 5 L. Ed. 2d 678, 81 S. Ct. 650, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1650, SCDB 1960-054

Decision Date: 2/27/1961

Docket Number: No. 111

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Pugach v. Dollinger, 365 U.S. 458, 5 L. Ed. 2d 678, 81 S. Ct. 650, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1650, SCDB 1960-054 (1961)

More Cases: U.S. decisions from 1961

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 2% most-cited · cited by 77 decisions

Citing decisions

Authorities cited

Courts citing

1960s1970s1980s2010s2020s

2d Cir.11

S.D.N.Y.11

7th Cir.4

N.D. Ill.4

U.S.4

N.Y.3

Most recently cited by10

2022Powell v. Radtke E.D. Wis.
2013B & B Harris Management, LLC v. Illinois Gaming Board N.D. Ill.
2010SKS & Associates, Inc. v. Dart 7th Cir.
1984Ciminelli v. Cablevision E.D.N.Y.
1983City of Los Angeles v. Lyons U.S.
1981Home Box Office, Inc. v. Advanced Consumer Technology, Movie Antenna, Inc. S.D.N.Y.
1980Chartwell Communications Group v. Westbrook 6th Cir.
1979Orth-O-Vision, Inc. v. Home Box Office S.D.N.Y.
1977Network Project v. Corporation for Public Broadcasting D.C. Cir.
1976DeMaria v. Jones S.D.N.Y.

Cites 2 cases

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

PUGACH v. DOLLINGER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BRONX COUNTY, et al.

Mr. Justice Brennan would also affirm but solely on the authority of Stefanelli v. Minard, 342 U. S. 117.
with whom The Chief Justice concurs,

George J. Todaro argued the cause and filed a brief, and Frances Kahn filed an appearance, for petitioner.
Walter E. Dillon and Irving Anolik argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief were Isidore Dollinger, respondent, pro se, and Alexander E. Scheer.
Briefs of amici curiae, urging affirmance, were filed by Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Pax-ton Blair, Solicitor General, and Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of New York, and by Edward S. Silver and Aaron Nussbaum for the District Attorneys' Association of New York.
Emanuel Redfield filed a brief for the New York Civil Liberties Union et al., as amici curiae, urging reversal.

majority Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Schwartz v. Texas, 344 U. S. 199, and Stefanelli v. Minard, 342 U. S. 117.

Mr. Justice Brennan would also affirm but solely on the authority of Stefanelli v. Minard, 342 U. S. 117.