Process Gas Consumers Group v. Consumer Energy Council of America
U.S.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2022Rouch World LLC v. Department of Civil Rights Mich.
- 2018American Institute of Certifi v. IRS D.C. Cir.
- 2009National Parks Conservation Association v. Kempthorne D.D.C.
- 2009National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Salazar D.D.C.
- 2003McConnell v. Federal Election Commission D.D.C.
- 2001Carmel Valley Fire Protection District v. State Cal.
- 1998State ex rel. Tomasic v. Unified Government Kan.
- 1995State ex rel. Meadows v. Hechler W. Va.
- 1994Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. Espy D.C. Cir.
- 1994Liquid Carbonic Industries Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission D.C. Cir.
Cites 2 cases
- Consumer Energy Council of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Consumers Union of U. S., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Process Gas Consumers Group et al. v. Consumer Energy Council of America et al.; Interstate Natural Gas Association of America et al. v. Consumer Energy Council of America et al.; Petrochemical Energy Group v. Consumer Energy Council of America et al.; American Gas Assn. v. Consumer Energy Council of America et al.; United States Senate v. Consumer Energy Council of America et al.; United States House of Representatives v. Consumer Energy Council of America et al.; United States Senate v. Federal Trade Commission et al.; and United States House of Representatives v. Federal Trade Commission et al.
Judges
- Justice Rehnquist would note probable jurisdiction and set cases for oral argument. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these appeals.
C. A. D. C. Cir. Judgment in Nos. 81-2008, 81-2020, 81-2151, and 81-2171 affirmed.
Justice Rehnquist would note probable jurisdiction and set cases for oral argument. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these appeals.
Certiorari in Nos. 82-177 and 82-209 denied. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. Judgment in Nos. 82-935 and 82-1044 affirmed. JUSTICE REHNQUIST would note probable jurisdiction and set cases for oral argument. Motion of Charles Pashayan, Jr., et al. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in No. 82-1044 granted. Reported below: Nos. 81-2008, 81-2020, 81-2151, 81-2171, 82-177, and 82-209, 218 U. S. App. D. C. 34, 673 F. 2d 425; Nos. 82-935 and 82-1044, 223 U. S. App. D. C. 386, 691 F. 2d 575.