Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

D.C. Cir.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Citations: 808 F.3d 1, 420 U.S. App. D.C. 229, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8326, 2015 WL 5692512

Decision Date: 5/20/2015

Docket Number: Nos. 13-5368, 13-5371, 14-5021

Jurisdiction: U.S.

Bluebook Citation: Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health & Human Services, 808 F.3d 1, 420 U.S. App. D.C. 229, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8326, 2015 WL 5692512 (D.C. Cir. 2015)

More Cases: D.C. Cir. decisions from 2015

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Frequently CitedTop 19% most-cited · cited by 13 decisions

Citing decisions

Courts citing

Citations by decade

2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

11th Cir.3

D.D.C.2

3rd Cir.1

8th Cir.1

9th Cir.1

D.C. Cir.1

Most recently cited by10

2026Anash Inc v. Borough of Kingston 3rd Cir.
2025Jordan v. Blinken D.D.C.
2025Climate United Fund v. Citibank, N.A. D.C. Cir.
2024Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. District of Columbia D.D.C.
2021North Dakota, State of v. Burwell D.N.D.
2021Rodriguez Velez v. Pierluisi-Urrutia D.P.R.
2020On Fire Christian Center, Inc. v. Fischer W.D. Ky.
2019Hunter v. Ahearn (In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy Litigation) 9th Cir.
2018Doe v. United States 8th Cir.
2016Eternal Word Television Network, Inc. v. Alabama 11th Cir.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

PRIESTS FOR LIFE, et al., Appellants v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Appellees.

Judges

BEFORE: GARLAND, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS, TATEL, BROWN , GRIFFITH, KAVANAUGH , SRINIVASAN , MILLETT , PILLARD, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Attorneys

Robert Joseph Muise, Esquire, Ann Arbor, MI, David Eliezer Yerushalmi, Esquire, Law Offices of David Yerushalmi, PC, Chandler, AZ, for Appellants.
Adam C. Jed, Alisa B. Klein, Mark B. Stern, Beth S. Brinkmann, DOJ Appellate Counsel, Stuart F. Delery, Ronald C. Ma-chen, Jr., Esquire, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Charles Edward Davidow, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Marcia Devins Greenberger, Ayesha N. Khan, Esquire, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Washington, DC, Kim-berlee Wood Colby, Christian Legal Society, Springfield, VA, for Appellees.

majority PER CURIAM.

ORDER

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc

PER CURIAM.

Appellants/cross-appellees’ joint petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

A statement by Circuit Judge PILLARD, joined by Circuit Judges ROGERS and WILKINS, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.

A statement by Circuit Judge BROWN, joined by Circuit Judge HENDERSON, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.

A statement by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.