Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
D.C. Cir.
PRIESTS FOR LIFE, et al., Appellants v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Appellees.
Judges
- BEFORE: GARLAND, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS, TATEL, BROWN , GRIFFITH, KAVANAUGH , SRINIVASAN , MILLETT , PILLARD, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys
- Robert Joseph Muise, Esquire, Ann Arbor, MI, David Eliezer Yerushalmi, Esquire, Law Offices of David Yerushalmi, PC, Chandler, AZ, for Appellants.
- Adam C. Jed, Alisa B. Klein, Mark B. Stern, Beth S. Brinkmann, DOJ Appellate Counsel, Stuart F. Delery, Ronald C. Ma-chen, Jr., Esquire, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Charles Edward Davidow, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Marcia Devins Greenberger, Ayesha N. Khan, Esquire, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Washington, DC, Kim-berlee Wood Colby, Christian Legal Society, Springfield, VA, for Appellees.
majority
ORDER
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc
PER CURIAM.
Appellants/cross-appellees’ joint petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
A statement by Circuit Judge PILLARD, joined by Circuit Judges ROGERS and WILKINS, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.
A statement by Circuit Judge BROWN, joined by Circuit Judge HENDERSON, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.
A statement by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.
Chat with this case using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.