Pino v. Landon
U.S.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 3% most-cited · cited by 52 decisions
52
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
2
5
8
6
17
10
3
1
1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2021Brathwaite v. Garland 2d Cir.
- 2018J. M. ACOSTA BIA
- 2015SILVA-TREVINO BIA
- 2010Abreu v. Holder 2d Cir.
- 2009CARDENAS ABREU BIA
- 2008McLeod v. Mukasey 9th Cir.
- 2007Puello v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services 2d Cir.
- 2007Manuel Puello v. BCIS 2d Cir.
- 2005United States v. Florentino 1st Cir.
- 2004Montenegro v. Ashcroft 7th Cir.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
Pino v. Landon, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Attorneys
- Reuben Goodman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Paul T. Smith and Jacob Spiegel.
- John F. Davis argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General SobelojJ, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard J. Blanchard.
majority
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 870, to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Per Curiam:
On the record here we are unable to say that the conviction has attained such finality as to support an order of deportation within the contemplation of § 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The judgment is reversed.