People v. Tardbania

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 72 N.Y.2d 852, 532 N.Y.S.2d 354, 528 N.E.2d 507, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1645

Decision Date: 6/30/1988

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: People v. Tardbania, 72 N.Y.2d 852, 532 N.Y.S.2d 354, 528 N.E.2d 507, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1645 (1988)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1988

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Philip Tardbania, Appellant.

Attorneys

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Raymond, A. Meier for appellant.
Barry M. Donalty, District Attorney (William M. Weber of counsel), for respondent.

majority

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The remarks made by the prosecutor on summation do not require reversal. In some instances where the defendant objected, the objection was sustained and adequate curative instructions were given and in other instances no objection was taken. Therefore, no issue has been preserved for review by this court (CPL 470.05 [2]).

We have not passed on the double jeopardy issue decided by the Appellate Division because the defendant has not argued the point on this appeal.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.