People v. Tardbania

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 72 N.Y.2d 852, 532 N.Y.S.2d 354, 528 N.E.2d 507, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1645

Decision Date: 6/30/1988

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: People v. Tardbania, 72 N.Y.2d 852, 532 N.Y.S.2d 354, 528 N.E.2d 507, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 1645 (1988)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1988


Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Highly CitedTop 4% most-cited · cited by 64 decisions
64
Citing decisions
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

3
43
11
6
1
1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

N.Y. App. Div.61
N.Y.2
N.Y. App. Term.1
Most recently cited by10
  • 2022People v. Bradshaw N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2018People v. Lawson N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2018People v. Reddick (Gregory) N.Y. App. Term.
  • 2015People v. Singletary N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2014People v. Caldwell N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2014People v. Oliphant N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2011People v. Mingo N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2007People v. Dorgan N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2006People v. Parsons N.Y. App. Div.
  • 2006People v. Johnson N.Y. App. Div.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Philip Tardbania, Appellant.

Attorneys

  • APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
  • Raymond, A. Meier for appellant.
  • Barry M. Donalty, District Attorney (William M. Weber of counsel), for respondent.
majority

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The remarks made by the prosecutor on summation do not require reversal. In some instances where the defendant objected, the objection was sustained and adequate curative instructions were given and in other instances no objection was taken. Therefore, no issue has been preserved for review by this court (CPL 470.05 [2]).

We have not passed on the double jeopardy issue decided by the Appellate Division because the defendant has not argued the point on this appeal.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.