People v. Padro

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 75 N.Y.2d 820, 552 N.Y.S.2d 555, 551 N.E.2d 1233, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 136

Decision Date: 2/8/1990

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: People v. Padro, 75 N.Y.2d 820, 552 N.Y.S.2d 555, 551 N.E.2d 1233, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 136 (1990)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1990

Citation analytics

How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

★Highly CitedTop 2% most-cited · cited by 130 decisions

130

Citing decisions

Courts citing

Citations by decade

1990s2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this case

N.Y. App. Div.120

N.Y.2

N.Y. App. Term2

E.D.N.Y1

N.D.N.Y.1

Most recently cited by10

2026People v. Chabot N.Y. App. Div.
2025People v. Abdullah Tompkins Cty Ct.
2024People v. Sanchez
2023People v. Caruso N.Y. App. Div.
2023Haynes v. Attorney General of New York E.D.N.Y
2023People v. Marcano N.Y. App. Div.
2023People v. Hadlock N.Y. App. Div.
2022People v. Drach N.Y. App. Div.
2022People v. Scott N.Y. App. Div.
2021People v. Burgos N.Y. App. Div.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Moses Padro, Appellant.

Attorneys

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Myron Beldock and Lee F. Bantle for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Patrick J. Hynes and Donald J. Siewert of counsel), for respondent.

majority

Order affirmed. A postverdict motion made pursuant to CPL 330.30 is not, by itself, ordinarily sufficient to preserve a "question of law” within the meaning of CPL 470.05 (2) and inasmuch as defendant failed to make appropriate objections during trial, the points presented by defendant are not preserved for review in this court.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.