People v. Padro

N.Y.

Court: New York Court of Appeals

Citations: 75 N.Y.2d 820, 552 N.Y.S.2d 555, 551 N.E.2d 1233, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 136

Decision Date: 2/8/1990

Jurisdiction: NY

Bluebook Citation: People v. Padro, 75 N.Y.2d 820, 552 N.Y.S.2d 555, 551 N.E.2d 1233, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 136 (1990)

More Cases: N.Y. decisions from 1990

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Moses Padro, Appellant.

Attorneys

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Myron Beldock and Lee F. Bantle for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Patrick J. Hynes and Donald J. Siewert of counsel), for respondent.

majority

Order affirmed. A postverdict motion made pursuant to CPL 330.30 is not, by itself, ordinarily sufficient to preserve a "question of law” within the meaning of CPL 470.05 (2) and inasmuch as defendant failed to make appropriate objections during trial, the points presented by defendant are not preserved for review in this court.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Chat with this case using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this case, check whether it is still good law, and see every case that cites it. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.