People v. O'Brien
N.Y.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2025People v. Jacobs N.Y. App. Div.
- 2024People v. Humphrey N.Y. App. Div.
- 2024People v. Hatcher N.Y. App. Div.
- 2022People v. Jackson N.Y. App. Div.
- 2022People v. Rose N.Y. App. Div.
- 2022People v. Nektalov (Samual) N.Y. App. Term.
- 2022People v. Colter (Jimar) N.Y. App. Term.
- 2022People v. Hall N.Y. App. Div.
- 2022People v. Merritt (Chester) N.Y. App. Term.
- 2022People v. Sanchez (Rodolfo) N.Y. App. Term.
Cites 2 cases
- People v. Suarez
- People v. Di Raffaele
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony O’Brien, Appellant.
Attorneys
- APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
- Robert S. Dean and William E. Hellerstein for appellant.
- John J. Santucci, District Attorney (Deborah Carlin Stevens of counsel), for respondent.
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
When defendant entered a plea of guilty he forfeited his right to claim that he was deprived of a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 (People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940). Nor may defendant preserve his statutory speedy trial claim for appellate review by obtaining the consent of the prosecutor and the approval of the court at the time the plea is entered (People v Di Raffaele, 55 NY2d 234).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.