People v. Kolupa
N.Y.
Citation analytics
How this case sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this case
Most recently cited by10
- 2026People v. Galantino N.Y. App. Div.
- 2026People v. Falls N.Y. App. Term.
- 2025People v. Marcantonio N.Y. App. Div.
- 2023People v. Devitt N.Y. App. Div.
- 2022People v. Fedyk N.Y. App. Div.
- 2022People v. McDonnell N.Y. App. Div.
- 2022People v. Salierno (Marissa) N.Y. App. Term.
- 2022People v. Vasquez (Yessenia) N.Y. App. Term.
- 2022People v. Echevarria-Acevedo (Heriberto) N.Y. App. Term.
- 2021People v. Young N.Y. App. Div.
Cites 2 cases
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shannon M. Kolupa, Appellant.
Attorneys
- APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
- Frank J. Nebush, Jr., Public Defender, Criminal Division, Utica {Esther Cohen Lee of counsel), for appellant.
- Scott D. McNamara, District Attorney, Utica {Steven G. Cox of counsel), for respondent.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant failed to preserve his argument that the People introduced insufficient evidence to corroborate the child victim’s testimony. At the close of the People’s case, the trial court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss and defendant proceeded to present his own evidence. He did not thereafter renew the motion to dismiss at the close of his proof or specifically argue that there was not sufficient corroboration of the victim’s statements. As a result, this issue is not reviewable (see e.g. People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888, 889 [2006]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266, 273 [2004]; People v Hines, 97 NY2d 56, 61-62 [2001]). Defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.